Lately, I
have begun to question my relationship with my country; shouldn’t my country be
worthy of my sense of pride in, and patriotism for, Her? As the media was
screaming hoarse on the issue of Ms. Udwin’s documentary, some supporting and
some judging it as ‘voyeurism’, I realised I had not known the young lady, on
whose dreadful rape and murder the documentary is based, was called Jyoti
Singh. I knew her as ‘Nirbhaya’ – the fearless one, who brought a whole Nation together
– awakening the law-makers from their slumber and hitting hard at the
conscience of every Indian. Like every
other Indian (barring the few who neither have sense nor know ‘pride’), I, too,
am ashamed that we have not been able to create a country safe enough for a
lady to move around freely and fearlessly. The recent comments by a
not-so-honourable Member of Parliament stand testimony to the way a fraction
of our society views the Woman.
A lot of analysis
has gone into the entire mechanism of how, when and where Ms. Udwin obtained
her permissions to make the documentary. And in its haste to react, the
government, on its part, acted like the proverbial ostrich, by banning the
documentary from being aired. I wish, instead, that it had acted with as much
haste in ensuring speedy justice for ladies who are victims of misogynist attitudes.
But did the ban violate the freedom of speech and expression expected of a
democracy? It most certainly did.
As my
gentlemen friends cringed in disgust and spoke out, in shame, against the
attitudes of men who ‘featured’ in the documentary, the women were angered by
the extent of gruesome thoughts that ‘socio-psycho-paths’ expressed so
blatantly. The documentary provided a platform to these men who were already
upheld as guilty of crime, by a lower court, to rationalise their crime. The
only ‘platform’ that they should have is the court of law – we still are a
democracy, with a vibrant judicial system, that entitles every person suspected
of a crime to a fair trial. Was it right for the documentary to be made on a
matter still sub-judice? It certainly wasn’t.
I am sure
that many women, like I, would have borne the brunt of the behaviour displayed by misogynist men who carried
disgusting minds in their heads – being whistled at, teased, groped
inappropriately and worse, sexually assaulted. While the documentary showed men
who harboured criminal and barbaric views, it did not speak of even a single
man who stood by a lady, protecting her, fighting for her and, in some cases,
losing his life in ensuring the dignity of the woman. My India has many, many,
many men like that. Should they have not been hailed in the documentary? They
most certainly should have.
The whole world
went berserk analysing our society, criticising our thinking and projecting
India as a country grossly unsafe for women – ‘the rape capital of the World’. Quoting from an article from More, “….India only ranks third for the number of
rapes reported each year. What country ranks first? The United States. In India, a country of
over 1.2 billion people, 24,206 rapes were reported in 2011. The same year in the United States, a nation
of 300 million, 83,425 rapes were reported. In the United States, every 6.2
minutes a woman is raped.” Ofcourse, not all cases of sexual assault are
reported in India. So, the statistics may be far more alarming. The documentary surely hit us where it hurts the
hardest; celebrities from across the globe endorsed it. Ms. Udwin had claimed
that the documentary was intended as a study: did even a single academician
endorse it as a great piece of work on studying the psychology of a (sexual) criminal?
None that I came across.
Even as I
write this, the most recent incident of the dastardly gang rape of a 72 year
old nun occupies the discussion space. More discussions, more candle light demonstrations
and more inconclusive debating in the parliament; and, then, we all fall silent.
There now seems to be a pattern to our reaction as a society. While in school,
I had studied about the brave women of our country – women who strode alongside
men, sometimes even leading them – Razia Sultan, Kittur Rani Channamma, Jhansi ki Rani
to name just a few. I don’t know of any other country that could claim the
contribution of so many brave women protagonists who scripted the history of
the country.
Sadly, as we script a new history, women no longer enjoy that role. And like 600 million others, I am India’s daughter.
1 comment:
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/crossing-an-ethical-line-indias-daughter-comes-in-the-way-of-a-fair-trial-for-nirbhaya-convicts/
Post a Comment